· Describe the information system organization you selected.
July 17, 2019
IT planning process for ModMeters which will accomplish the demands outlined in the mini case.
July 17, 2019

W8A4

Assignment 4: Entering Assets into the Learning Management System (LMS)

 

Once your curriculum and assets have been approved by your professor, upload them into CourseSites.com at https://www.coursesites.com/webapps/Bb-sites-course-creation-BBLEARN/pages/index.html or Schoology.com at https://www.schoology.com/home.php to demonstrate how your material is delivered through an LMS. Note: These are both free sites.

 

In the LMS, complete the following:

 

1. Create a course using your curriculum. Note: The course can be short and simple depending on the topic and curriculum of your course. The goal is to test whether the assets work functionally in the LMS.

 

2. Perform two to three (2-3) tasks (e.g., respond to a discussion question, view a video, etc.) in the course that you are invited to participate.

 

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

 

1. Explain the method and process that you used for uploading and maintaining your assets into the LMS (e.g., determining where to place the assets, in what order, etc.). Next, explain how you will document the need for revisions to the course as well as the process you would recommend to keep your course design agile.

 

2. Examine your experience as an end user in the course in which you were invited to participate. Evaluate whether or not the navigation and display of the learning assets supported your ability to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate the course material. Include at least one (1) example of such experience to support your response.

 

3. Determine the main constraints of the course in which you were invited to participate. Suggest at least one (1) change that you would make to the menu options and the display in order to improve the user experience. Provide a rationale for your response.

 

4. Compare and contrast your experience as the person creating the assets in the LMS and your experience as a student in the LMS. Next, discuss on at least one (1) change that you would make in order to improve the learning assets and the display for your own course.

 

5. Provide at least two (2) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the paper’s claims.

 

6. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:

 

a. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.

 

b. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

 

c. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

· Describe reasons for modifying the menu options and display of a Learning Management System (LMS).

 

· Recognize various roles of users in a Learning Management System (LMS).

 

· Utilize an LMS to perform tasks and communicate to users.

 

· Design learning assets based on end user or organizational needs.

 

· Use technology and information resources to research issues in technology tools to manage learning.

 

· Write clearly and concisely about issues in technology tools to manage learning using proper writing mechanics.

 

 

 

Points: 150

 

Assignment 4: Entering Assets into the Learning Management   System (LMS)

 

 

 

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

 

Below   70% F

 

Fair

 

70-79%   C

 

Proficient

 

80-89%   B

 

Exemplary

 

90-100%   A

 

 

 

1. Explain the method and process   that you used for uploading and maintaining your assets into the LMS (e.g.,   determining where to place the assets, in what order, etc.). Next, explain   how you will document the need for revisions to the course as well as the   process you would recommend to keep your course design agile.

 

Weight: 15%

 

Did not submit or incompletely   explained the method and process that you used for uploading and maintaining   your assets into the LMS (e.g., determining where to place the assets, in   what order, etc.). Did not submit or incompletely explained how you will   document the need for revisions to the course as well as the process you   would recommend to keep your course design agile.

 

Partially explained the   method and process that you used for uploading and maintaining your assets   into the LMS (e.g., determining where to place the assets, in what order,   etc.). Partially explained how you will document the need for revisions to   the course as well as the process you would recommend to keep your course   design agile.

 

Satisfactorily explained the   method and process that you used for uploading and maintaining your assets   into the LMS (e.g., determining where to place the assets, in what order,   etc.). Satisfactorily explained how you will document the need for revisions   to the course as well as the process you would recommend to keep your course   design agile.

 

Thoroughly explained the   method and process that you used for uploading and maintaining your assets   into the LMS (e.g., determining where to place the assets, in what order,   etc.). Thoroughly explained how you will document the need for revisions   to the course as well as the process you would recommend to keep your course   design agile.

 

 

 

2. Examine your experience as an   end user in the course in which you were invited to participate. Evaluate   whether or not the navigation and display of the learning assets supported   your ability to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate the course material. Include   at least one (1) example of such experience to support your response.

Weight: 20%

 

Did not submit or incompletely   examined your experience as an end user in the course in which you were   invited to participate. Did not submit or incompletely evaluated whether or   not the navigation and display of the learning assets supported your ability   to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate the course material. Did not submit or   incompletely included at least one (1) example of such experience to support   your response.

 

Partially examined your experience   as an end user in the course in which you were invited to participate.   Partially evaluated whether or not the navigation and display of the learning   assets supported your ability to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate the course   material. Partially included at least one (1) example of such experience to   support your response.

 

Satisfactorily examined your   experience as an end user in the course in which you were invited to   participate. Satisfactorily evaluated whether or not the navigation and   display of the learning assets supported your ability to synthesize, analyze,   and evaluate the course material. Satisfactorily included at least one (1)   example of such experience to support your response.

 

Thoroughly examined your experience   as an end user in the course in which you were invited to participate.   Thoroughly evaluated whether or not the navigation and display of the   learning assets supported your ability to synthesize, analyze, and evaluate   the course material. Thoroughly included at least one (1) example of such   experience to support your response.

 

 

 

3. Determine the main constraints   of the course in which you were invited to participate. Suggest at least one   (1) change that you would make to the menu options and the display in order   to improve the user experience. Provide a rationale for your response.

 

Weight: 20%

 

Did not submit or incompletely determined the   main constraints of the course in which you were invited to participate. Did   not submit or incompletelysuggested at least one (1) change that you would   make to the menu options and the display in order to improve the user   experience. Did not submit or incompletelyprovided a rationale for your   response.

 

Partially determined the   main constraints of the course in which you were invited to participate.   Partially suggested at least one (1) change that you would make to the menu   options and the display in order to improve the user experience. Partially   provided a rationale for your response.

 

Satisfactorily determined the   main constraints of the course in which you were invited to participate.   Satisfactorilysuggested at least one (1) change that you would make to the   menu options and the display in order to improve the user experience.   Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

 

Thoroughly determined the   main constraints of the course in which you were invited to participate.   Thoroughlysuggested at least one (1) change that you would make to the menu   options and the display in order to improve the user experience. Thoroughly   provided a rationale for your response.

 

 

 

4. Compare and contrast your   experience as the person creating the assets in the LMS and your experience   as a student in the LMS. Next, discuss on at least one (1) change that you   would make in order to improve the learning assets and the display for your   own course.

 

Weight: 20%

 

Did not submit or incompletely   compared and contrasted your experience as the person creating the assets in   the LMS and your experience as a student in the LMS. Did not submit or   incompletely discussed on at least one (1) change that you would make in   order to improve the learning assets and the display for your own course.

 

Partially compared and   contrasted your experience as the person creating the assets in the LMS and   your experience as a student in the LMS. Partially discussed on at least one   (1) change that you would make in order to improve the learning assets and   the display for your own course.

 

Satisfactorily compared and   contrasted your experience as the person creating the assets in the LMS and   your experience as a student in the LMS. Satisfactorily discussed on at least   one (1) change that you would make in order to improve the learning assets   and the display for your own course.

 

Thoroughly compared and contrasted   your experience as the person creating the assets in the LMS and your   experience as a student in the LMS. Thoroughly discussed on at least one (1)   change that you would make in order to improve the learning assets and the   display for your own course.

 

 

 

5. Provide at least two (2)   reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used   previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the   paper’s claims.

 

Weight: 5%

 

No references provided.

 

Does not meet the required number   of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

 

Meets number of required   references; all references high quality choices.

 

Exceeds number of required   references; all references high quality choices.

 

 

 

6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and   Formatting

 

Weight: 5%

 

Serious and persistent errors in   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

 

Partially free of errors in   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

 

Mostly free of errors in grammar,   spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

 

Error free or almost error free   grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

 

 

 

7. Appropriate use of APA in-text   citations and reference section

 

Weight: 5%

 

Lack of in-text citations and / or   lack of reference section.

 

In-text citations and references   are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

 

Most in-text citations and   references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA   style.

 

In-text citations and references   are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in   APA style.

 

 

 

8. Information Literacy /   Integration of Sources

 

Weight: 5%

 

Serious errors in the integration   of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use   in-text citations.

 

Sources are partially integrated   using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

 

Sources are mostly integrated   using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

 

Sources are consistently   integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and   summarizing.

 

 

 

9. Clarity and Coherence of   Writing

 

Weight: 5%

 

Information is confusing to the   reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support   ideas.

 

Information is partially clear   with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

 

Information is mostly clear and   generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

 

Information is provided in a   clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that   logically support ideas.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”


W8A4 was first posted on July 17, 2019 at 6:21 pm.
©2019 "nursing Writers". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at admin@nursingassignmenttutor.com

 

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"

%d bloggers like this: