modes of entry
November 21, 2020
1&2 in different docs references with citations and please more than 300 words at least 2 references. prichai
November 21, 2020

MGMT203 ERAU Management for Aeronautical Science Crew Resource Management Video Analysis

Here are the instructions for this assignment:

The video linked below provides a review of different CRM accidents, SHEL model, crew communication, and processes. Approximately 80 percent of all accidents are related to human factors (FAA, 2016, p.2. 2).

Crew Resource Management CRM (YouTube – 13:10) (Links to an external site.)

Please number and state each question/statement and write a separate paragraph or paragraphs for each answer.

  1. A brief introduction of human factors.
  2. Summarize different problems or failures related to human factors. You may use accident reports, videos, and research documents located in Hunt Library.
  3. Since you have just been promoted to management, what actions can you take to prevent human factors incidents and accidents? Please consider the management functions: planning, organizing, staffing, leading, and controlling.

Assignment Criteria

  • Include a Cover Page
    • Cover page includes your name, date, Course #, and Module Assignment #, Title.
  • Give each answer in its separate paragraph(s).
  • 500 words minimum, not including References or Cover Page
  • The paper should be grammatically sound and free of spelling errors.
  • Citations and references must be in current APA format.
  • Double Spaced
  • A minimum of 3 references, in the Reference section at the end of the paper, is required.
    • Two references must be scholarly, peer-reviewed, and from reputable sources.
    • One textbook reference is acceptable.

This paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin. This is a

service that checks your work for improper citation or potential

plagiarism by comparing it against a database of web pages, student

papers, and articles from academic books and publications. Ensure that

your work is entirely your own and that you have not plagiarized any

material!

Review the Assignment Rubric for detailed grading criteria.

The following is the grading rubic:

MGMT 203 6.3 Assignment Rubric

MGMT 203 6.3 Assignment Rubric

CriteriaRatings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstration of Knowledge and Comprehension of Assigned Reading(s)

25.0 pts (Excellent – A) Posts clearly indicate that readings were understood and concepts incorporated well into responses.

23.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Posts indicate readings were understood and incorporated into responses.

21.0 pts (Average – C) Posts have questionable relationship to reading material.

19.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Posts do not indicate that readings were understood and/or not incorporated into discussion.

17.0 pts (Failing – F) Posts demonstrate a total lack of understanding and no attempt to incorporate concepts are included in posts. Post are flip or there are none at all.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Timely Discussion Contributions

20.0 pts (Excellent – A) All required posts submitted. Replies to several colleagues’ discussions points submitted. Posts are well distributed throughout the week.

18.0 pts (Above-Average – B) All required posts submitted. Replies to few colleagues’ discussions points submitted. Posts are distributed throughout the week.

16.0 pts (Average – C) All required posts submitted. Replies to several colleagues’ discussions points not submitted. Postings are not distributed throughout the week.

14.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) All required posts not submitted. Replies to several colleagues’ discussions points not submitted. Postings are not distributed throughout the week.

12.0 pts (Failing – F) No attempt to post initial responses. No replies to colleagues.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Postings

20.0 pts (Excellent – A) Posts reflect the readings and outside information with proper outside source material citation.

18.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Posts reflect the reading and some outside source material but outside source material not cited.

16.0 pts (Average – C) Posts reflect some understanding of the reading.

14.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Posts are not relevant to the questions posed.

12.0 pts (Failing – F) Posts demonstrate a total lack of relevance to questions posed. Flip answers or there is none at all.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Reply

20.0 pts (Excellent – A) Response relevant to posting and supports position with factual information.

18.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Response relevant to posting but fails to support position.

16.0 pts (Average – C) Response somewhat relevant to posting but fails to support position.

14.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Response not relevant to original posting.

12.0 pts (Failing – F) Response demonstrate a total lack of relevance to original post. Flip responses or there is none at all.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Adherence to Online Protocols

15.0 pts (Excellent – A) ERAU on-line protocols followed.

12.0 pts (Above-Average – B) ERAU on-line protocols followed.

10.0 pts (Average – C) ERAU on-line protocols followed.

8.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) ERAU on-line protocols violated.

6.0 pts (Failing – F) ERAU on-line protocols violated.

15.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

The post MGMT203 ERAU Management for Aeronautical Science Crew Resource Management Video Analysis appeared first on Submit Your Homework.


MGMT203 ERAU Management for Aeronautical Science Crew Resource Management Video Analysis was first posted on November 21, 2020 at 12:55 am.
©2019 "Submit Your Assignment". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at [email protected]

 

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"